CaliforniaSchoolsWilliam Hopkins Middle

William Hopkins Middle

PublicRegular
Fremont, California · Fremont Unified
Teachers57.0FTE
Ratio24.9:1students per teacher
Students1,417enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students1,417
Grade Span6–8
Student:Teacher24.9:1
Free/Reduced Lunch13%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
24.6:1
1.2%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
58
1.8%vs prior yr
Enrollment
1,424
0.5%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:489
4.9%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:2,876
4.9%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,630
36.6%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.6:116.8:119.0:121.3:123.5:125.7:12020202120222023202423.3:121.9:122.2:124.9:124.6:1William Hopkins MiddleUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

8689871,1071,2261,3461,465404448515559202020212022202320249789409091,4171,4244243415758EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment9789409091,4171,424
Teacher FTE4243415758
Pupil : Teacher ratio23.3:121.9:122.2:124.9:124.6:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:1111:2221:3331:4441:5552015201720201:5141:5141:489Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:7401:1,4801:2,2201:2,9611:3,7012015201720201:2,8561:3,0241:2,8761:3,4271:2,5701:1,630Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)222
Nurses (FTE)0.40.30.3
Psychologists (FTE)0.30.40.6
Social Workers (FTE)000
Counselor : Pupils1:5141:5141:4891:250
Nurse : Pupils1:2,8561:3,0241:2,8761:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:3,4271:2,5701:1,6301:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.