CaliforniaSchoolsOak Ridge High

Oak Ridge High

PublicRegular
El Dorado Hills, California · El Dorado Union High
Teachers97.0FTE
Ratio24.5:1students per teacher
Students2,375enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students2,375
Grade Span8–12
Student:Teacher24.5:1
Free/Reduced Lunch9%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Visit school website →
Student : Teacher
25.5:1
4.1%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
92
5.2%vs prior yr
Enrollment
2,346
1.2%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:445
2.8%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:2,491
29.4%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:2,491
0.9%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.6:116.9:119.3:121.6:124.0:126.3:12020202120222023202425.2:125.1:125.2:124.5:125.5:1Oak Ridge HighUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

2,3312,3752,4192,4642,5082,55291939598100102202020212022202320242,4912,5372,5162,3752,346991011009792EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment2,4912,5372,5162,3752,346
Teacher FTE991011009792
Pupil : Teacher ratio25.2:125.1:125.2:124.5:125.5:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:991:1981:2961:3951:4942015201720201:4571:4571:445Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:7621:1,5241:2,2871:3,0491:3,8112015201720201:2,4701:3,5291:2,4911:2,4701:2,4701:2,491Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)5.45.45.6
Nurses (FTE)10.71
Psychologists (FTE)111
Social Workers (FTE)000
Counselor : Pupils1:4571:4571:4451:250
Nurse : Pupils1:2,4701:3,5291:2,4911:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:2,4701:2,4701:2,4911:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.