CaliforniaSchoolsIshi Hills Middle

Ishi Hills Middle

PublicRegular
Oroville, California · Oroville City Elementary
Teachers17.0FTE
Ratio19.7:1students per teacher
Students335enrolled
SCHOOL SNAPSHOT
Students335
Grade Span6–8
Student:Teacher19.7:1
Free/Reduced Lunch74%
Title INo
SectorPublic
Student : Teacher
17.3:1
12.2%vs prior yrUS avg 15.4:1
Teacher FTE
17
0.0%vs prior yr
Enrollment
294
12.2%vs prior yr
Years of Data
5
2020–2024
Counselors
1:339
0.9%vs prior yrASCA max 1:250
Nurses
1:2,421
6.3%vs prior yrNASN max 1:750
Psychologists
1:1,695
0.9%vs prior yrNASP max 1:500
Social Workers
SSWAA max 1:250
Trends & 5-year history below

Pupil : Teacher Ratio — 5-Year Trend

14.8:116.6:118.4:120.1:121.9:123.7:12020202120222023202421.2:123.1:120.1:119.7:117.3:1Ishi Hills MiddleUS public-school avg

Enrollment & Teacher FTE

290301311322332343141415161717202020212022202320243393243023352941614151717EnrollmentTeacher FTE

Year-by-year workforce

Metric20202021202220232024Nat Avg
Enrollment339324302335294
Teacher FTE1614151717
Pupil : Teacher ratio21.2:123.1:120.1:119.7:117.3:115.4:1

What These Numbers Mean

Teacher FTE

Full-Time Equivalent counts part-time teachers proportionally. One full-time teacher = 1.0 FTE; two half-time teachers also = 1.0 FTE. This is the standard federal reporting unit.

Pupil : Teacher ratio

NCES-reported ratio divides total enrollment by teacher FTE. It is NOT the same as average class size — schools with specialists, coaches, and resource teachers will show lower ratios than typical class sizes.

How to read the trend

A falling pupil:teacher ratio (line going down) means more staffing per student — generally a positive signal. A rising line can indicate budget pressure or fast enrollment growth outpacing hiring. Always compare to the US average (dashed grey).

Historical data spans 20202024 from NCES CCD.

Student Support & Wellbeing

Non-teaching staff who support student mental health, physical health, and behavioural needs. Lower pupil-to-staff ratios mean more one-on-one access.

Counselors & Social Workers — staff to pupils (recommended 1:250)

1:01:1451:2901:4351:5811:7262015201720201:6721:3361:339Counselor : PupilsSocial Worker : PupilsRecommended 1:250

Nurses & Psychologists — staff to pupils

1:01:5581:1,1171:1,6751:2,2331:2,7912015201720201:2,5851:2,5851:2,4211:1,1201:1,6801:1,695Nurse : PupilsNASN 1:750Psychologist : PupilsNASP 1:500

Support staffing & ratios — year by year

Metric201520172020Nat Avg
Counselors (FTE)0.511
Nurses (FTE)0.10.10.1
Psychologists (FTE)0.30.20.2
Social Workers (FTE)000
Counselor : Pupils1:6721:3361:3391:250
Nurse : Pupils1:2,5851:2,5851:2,4211:750
Psychologist : Pupils1:1,1201:1,6801:1,6951:500
Social Worker : Pupils1:250

Why these ratios matter

Counselors (ASCA 250:1)

School counselors support academic planning, college & career readiness, and social-emotional wellbeing. The American School Counselor Association recommends no more than 250 students per counselor.

Nurses (NASN 750:1)

School nurses manage chronic conditions, medications, immunisations, and emergencies. The National Association of School Nurses recommends at least 1 full-time nurse per 750 students (more for high-need populations).

Psychologists (NASP 500:1)

School psychologists assess learning & behavioural needs, run mental-health interventions, and coordinate special-education services. NASP recommends 500:1 or lower.

Social workers (SSWAA 250:1)

School social workers bridge home-school relationships, address attendance & trauma, and connect families to community resources. SSWAA recommends 250:1.

Source: US Dept of Education CRDC (20152020) — Civil Rights Data Collection.